Bethe Pitbull admits going through the 'most difficult time' of her career with her departure from UFC 227
The Brazilian vented on her Instagram after being removed from the card in Los Angeles and assured that she had been cleared by doctors to fight
Franciele Marques
02/08/2018 | 12:56
B. Correia (photo) had a detached retina a few years ago. Photo: Reproduction/Instagram bethecorreia
The former bantamweight title challenger, Bethe Correia should return to the cage this Saturday (04) at UFC 227 in Los Angeles after not fighting for a year. Her opponent in the preliminary card clash would be the Mexican, Irene aldana. On the eve of the event, the California State Athletic Commission announced that Correia's vision was not good and removed her from the show. This Wednesday, the Brazilian opened up about her departure to her fans on Instagram: “this situation, in my entire career, is the most difficult”.
Bethe explained that she had already been cleared by three doctors accredited by the Brazilian Society of Ophthalmology to return to fight. Thus, she stated that she was surprised by the California Athletic Commission when they told her that she would not be able to fight this weekend due to vision problems.
PUBLICITY:
“Retinal detachment is a common problem in contact sports and that several fighters have had, so much so that, in my last five MMA fights, I had already undergone surgery for retinal detachment, including the one in which I competed for the world title. in 2015 with the Ronda Rousey. I have never been rejected from any commission and I have fought in several different countries with the same problem, only here in California where it is known as the “land of dreams” they destroyed my hope of making my triumphant return this Saturday”, said the Brazilian.
Bethe's clash with Aldana was canceled and will not be replaced by another at UFC 227. The Brazilian's return to the cage will depend on a new medical approval on the condition of her eye. Pitbull had his last fight in July 2017, when he lost to Holly holm.
Comments